Some have argued that DNA samples for pre-trial identification is a violation of their 5th Amendment right to?

Some have argued that DNA samples for pre-trial identification is a violation of their 5th Amendment right to be free from incriminating themselves. What do you think? Does the 5th amendment extend to DNA swabs?Some have argued that DNA samples for pre-trial identification is a violation of their 5th Amendment right to?
Not if our legal system is indeed based on justice and not just loop holes and legal garbadegoog.Some have argued that DNA samples for pre-trial identification is a violation of their 5th Amendment right to?
Nope. DNA is perfectly reasonable. If we won't let them do DNA tests, what next? Not being able to look at their shoe prints?

We allow fingerprint dusting- how is that any less incriminating than DNA? They're both a part of you.

It makes me sick when people commit crimes and then call the police lawbreakers for simply trying to keep us safe.Some have argued that DNA samples for pre-trial identification is a violation of their 5th Amendment right to?
They are not incriminating themselves. The doctors preforming the test are incriminating them.
Correction:



Only the GUILTY are complaining.



If I were innocent, I'd hurry to get DNA'ed.

book club recommendations

vocelli